<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 1608 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303426</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed under section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT), holding that the assessment order was not both erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that the Assessing Officer had taken a plausible view supported by law, and disagreement with this view did not warrant invoking section 263. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 09:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 1608 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303426</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the order passed under section 263 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT), holding that the assessment order was not both erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the Revenue. The Tribunal emphasized that the Assessing Officer had taken a plausible view supported by law, and disagreement with this view did not warrant invoking section 263. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>