<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1408 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(Appeals) to allow the provision for Gratuity under Section 40(A)(7) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal found that the Gratuity fund was approved and provisions were made by the assessee, making Section 40A(7)(b) applicable instead of Section 40A(7)(a). The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the CIT(Appeals)&#039; decision, with the order pronounced on 31st July 2015 in Chennai.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2022 09:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1408 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(Appeals) to allow the provision for Gratuity under Section 40(A)(7) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal found that the Gratuity fund was approved and provisions were made by the assessee, making Section 40A(7)(b) applicable instead of Section 40A(7)(a). The appeal of the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the CIT(Appeals)&#039; decision, with the order pronounced on 31st July 2015 in Chennai.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>