<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 722 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303418</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC admitted the Company Petition and ordered the winding up of the Respondent Company as they did not oppose the Petition. The Petition was allowed in terms of Prayer Clauses (a) and (b). Company Application No.77 of 2010 was also disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 19:16:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 722 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303418</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC admitted the Company Petition and ordered the winding up of the Respondent Company as they did not oppose the Petition. The Petition was allowed in terms of Prayer Clauses (a) and (b). Company Application No.77 of 2010 was also disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>