<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (6) TMI 1022 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant had provided enough evidence to establish the genuineness of purchases made from M/s. Venus Lubricants, criticizing the Assessing Officer for not verifying the party&#039;s existence adequately. The burden of proof was deemed discharged by the appellant, shifting the onus to the revenue. As a result, the disallowance of Rs. 1,18,130 as bogus purchases was overturned, and the appeal was partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 18:02:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (6) TMI 1022 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant had provided enough evidence to establish the genuineness of purchases made from M/s. Venus Lubricants, criticizing the Assessing Officer for not verifying the party&#039;s existence adequately. The burden of proof was deemed discharged by the appellant, shifting the onus to the revenue. As a result, the disallowance of Rs. 1,18,130 as bogus purchases was overturned, and the appeal was partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>