<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (4) TMI 318 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303416</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appellant&#039;s case regarding the Floor Space Index (FSI) agreement, emphasizing the necessity of State Government approval for FSI modifications. The doctrine of promissory estoppel was deemed inapplicable as the agreement lacked legal validity without official sanction. The Court denied the appellant&#039;s request for a writ of mandamus, stating the absence of a legally enforceable right. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed with no cost orders issued.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2022 15:42:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (4) TMI 318 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303416</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appellant&#039;s case regarding the Floor Space Index (FSI) agreement, emphasizing the necessity of State Government approval for FSI modifications. The doctrine of promissory estoppel was deemed inapplicable as the agreement lacked legal validity without official sanction. The Court denied the appellant&#039;s request for a writ of mandamus, stating the absence of a legally enforceable right. Ultimately, the appeal was dismissed with no cost orders issued.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>