<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (1) TMI 9 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29570</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming the validity of initiating proceedings under s. 17 of the Wealth-tax Act based on voluntary disclosure under s. 68 of the Finance Act, 1965. The Court ruled in favor of the revenue, affirming the Wealth-tax Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to initiate such proceedings and the assessee&#039;s liability for wealth-tax despite payment under the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme. The Court emphasized that the disclosure under s. 68 did not absolve the assessee from wealth-tax liability, maintaining that the initiation of proceedings was not solely reliant on the disclosure petition under s. 68.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:35:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (1) TMI 9 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29570</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, confirming the validity of initiating proceedings under s. 17 of the Wealth-tax Act based on voluntary disclosure under s. 68 of the Finance Act, 1965. The Court ruled in favor of the revenue, affirming the Wealth-tax Officer&#039;s jurisdiction to initiate such proceedings and the assessee&#039;s liability for wealth-tax despite payment under the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme. The Court emphasized that the disclosure under s. 68 did not absolve the assessee from wealth-tax liability, maintaining that the initiation of proceedings was not solely reliant on the disclosure petition under s. 68.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>