<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 903 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425348</link>
    <description>An institution engaged in training and skill-development for poor communities in backward rural areas retained charitable character because its activities were supported by grants and donations and there was no material showing a profit motive. Mere receipt of consideration or supervision of grant utilisation did not make the activity trade, commerce or business, especially where no fees were charged beyond actual project cost. On those facts, the proviso to Section 2(15) was not attracted and exemption under Section 11 remained available; the concurrent factual findings also showed no perversity warranting interference.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2022 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 903 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425348</link>
      <description>An institution engaged in training and skill-development for poor communities in backward rural areas retained charitable character because its activities were supported by grants and donations and there was no material showing a profit motive. Mere receipt of consideration or supervision of grant utilisation did not make the activity trade, commerce or business, especially where no fees were charged beyond actual project cost. On those facts, the proviso to Section 2(15) was not attracted and exemption under Section 11 remained available; the concurrent factual findings also showed no perversity warranting interference.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425348</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>