https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425320 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Order-in-Original demanding service tax for a specific period. The Tribunal determined that the demand was not time-barred as there was no evidence of suppression of facts or misconduct by the appellant. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing dutiable goods, was granted consequential benefits as the situation was deemed revenue neutral due to the availability of Cenvat credit. The appeal was allowed, resolving the limitation issue concerning the service tax demand. en-us Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jul 2022 09:26:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425320 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the Order-in-Original demanding service tax for a specific period. The Tribunal determined that the demand was not time-barred as there was no evidence of suppression of facts or misconduct by the appellant. The appellant, engaged in manufacturing dutiable goods, was granted consequential benefits as the situation was deemed revenue neutral due to the availability of Cenvat credit. The appeal was allowed, resolving the limitation issue concerning the service tax demand. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425320