<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2273 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303406</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed ONGC&#039;s appeal and allowed Reliance&#039;s appeal, reinstating the 18% interest rate for pre-reference and pendente lite periods. The Court emphasized that contractual clauses must explicitly bar interest to prevent arbitrators from awarding it and upheld the arbitrator&#039;s discretion in determining interest rates. ONGC was ordered to pay the differential interest amount within eight weeks, with clarified future interest rates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 21:00:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2273 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303406</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed ONGC&#039;s appeal and allowed Reliance&#039;s appeal, reinstating the 18% interest rate for pre-reference and pendente lite periods. The Court emphasized that contractual clauses must explicitly bar interest to prevent arbitrators from awarding it and upheld the arbitrator&#039;s discretion in determining interest rates. ONGC was ordered to pay the differential interest amount within eight weeks, with clarified future interest rates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303406</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>