https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303408 In a disproportionate assets prosecution, a discharge cannot rest on the ground that the accused was not given a separate opportunity during investigation to explain the assets when statements were recorded and sanction otherwise existed. A claimed defect in sanction based on non-consideration of the explanation concerns the validity of sanction, not its absence, and is ordinarily for trial. At the discharge stage, the court must examine the charge-sheet material on assets, income, expenditure and alleged disproportion; disputed questions requiring evidence, including abetment allegations, are premature for final determination. en-us Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Sep 2025 15:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303408 In a disproportionate assets prosecution, a discharge cannot rest on the ground that the accused was not given a separate opportunity during investigation to explain the assets when statements were recorded and sanction otherwise existed. A claimed defect in sanction based on non-consideration of the explanation concerns the validity of sanction, not its absence, and is ordinarily for trial. At the discharge stage, the court must examine the charge-sheet material on assets, income, expenditure and alleged disproportion; disputed questions requiring evidence, including abetment allegations, are premature for final determination. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303408