https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303400 The majority judgment in the case dismissed the petition, upholding the competency of the Judicial Commissioner's Court and the interpretation of Article 145(3) of the Constitution, allowing for the division of cases between Constitution Bench and Division Bench for efficient judicial process. The dissenting opinion, on the other hand, would have declared the Division Bench's judgment invalid and required the appeal to be heard by a Constitution Bench. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed in line with the majority view. en-us Thu, 07 Apr 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:08:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303400 The majority judgment in the case dismissed the petition, upholding the competency of the Judicial Commissioner's Court and the interpretation of Article 145(3) of the Constitution, allowing for the division of cases between Constitution Bench and Division Bench for efficient judicial process. The dissenting opinion, on the other hand, would have declared the Division Bench's judgment invalid and required the appeal to be heard by a Constitution Bench. Ultimately, the petition was dismissed in line with the majority view. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Apr 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303400