<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 848 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals filed by the assessees, directing the AO to delete the additions made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of incriminating material for making additions in search assessments and upheld the right of the assessee to cross-examine witnesses whose statements were used against them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 09:24:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 848 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all the appeals filed by the assessees, directing the AO to delete the additions made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of incriminating material for making additions in search assessments and upheld the right of the assessee to cross-examine witnesses whose statements were used against them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>