<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 841 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425286</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, restricting the addition of unexplained cash credit to Rs.3,20,000 based on the peak credit method. The decision emphasized the significance of analyzing transaction details and considering the peak credit amount in cases involving unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 09:23:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 841 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425286</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, restricting the addition of unexplained cash credit to Rs.3,20,000 based on the peak credit method. The decision emphasized the significance of analyzing transaction details and considering the peak credit amount in cases involving unexplained cash credits under section 68 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>