<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 52 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29555</link>
    <description>The notional partition under section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 is a limited valuation fiction for determining the deceased coparcener&#039;s share and does not change the character of that interest into a separate, defined share for all purposes. For aggregation under section 34(1)(c) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, the deceased&#039;s passing interest remains coparcenary interest, so the distinction between property deemed to pass under section 7 and property passing under section 5 is immaterial. Accordingly, the lineal descendants&#039; share in joint family property was includible with the deceased&#039;s interest for rate purposes, and the accountable person&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:58:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 52 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29555</link>
      <description>The notional partition under section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 is a limited valuation fiction for determining the deceased coparcener&#039;s share and does not change the character of that interest into a separate, defined share for all purposes. For aggregation under section 34(1)(c) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, the deceased&#039;s passing interest remains coparcenary interest, so the distinction between property deemed to pass under section 7 and property passing under section 5 is immaterial. Accordingly, the lineal descendants&#039; share in joint family property was includible with the deceased&#039;s interest for rate purposes, and the accountable person&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>