<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1593 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the common order by Ld CIT(A) regarding additions on account of bogus purchases, directing a re-examination of all additions made by the AO in light of subsequent developments. Consequently, all appeals by the revenue and the assessee were treated as allowed for statistical purposes, with matters remanded back to Ld CIT(A) for fresh consideration based on relevant facts and developments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 09:22:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1593 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the common order by Ld CIT(A) regarding additions on account of bogus purchases, directing a re-examination of all additions made by the AO in light of subsequent developments. Consequently, all appeals by the revenue and the assessee were treated as allowed for statistical purposes, with matters remanded back to Ld CIT(A) for fresh consideration based on relevant facts and developments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>