<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1228 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303390</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings and additions for unexplained investments in properties. It deleted additions of 8% and 1.5% of undisclosed contract receipts, determining the cash payments were for material procurement, not contract work. Revenue appeals were partly allowed for AY 2007-08 and dismissed for other AYs; cross-objections and assessee appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 09:22:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1228 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303390</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the validity of reassessment proceedings and additions for unexplained investments in properties. It deleted additions of 8% and 1.5% of undisclosed contract receipts, determining the cash payments were for material procurement, not contract work. Revenue appeals were partly allowed for AY 2007-08 and dismissed for other AYs; cross-objections and assessee appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303390</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>