https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303395 A retrospective legislative amendment was upheld because it fell within legislative competence and did not amount to an impermissible overruling of final judicial decisions. The Court held that the SEBC Amendment Act, 2019 validly removed the basis of earlier objections by clarifying when the reservation regime applies to NEET-governed admissions. It further construed amended Section 16(2), including the special clause for NEET and similar national entrance tests, as a clear and unambiguous legislative choice fixing the cut-off for State quota admissions. On that reading, the amendment was valid and applicable to the admissions in question, and the reservation framework remained operative. en-us Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Jul 2022 09:22:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303395 A retrospective legislative amendment was upheld because it fell within legislative competence and did not amount to an impermissible overruling of final judicial decisions. The Court held that the SEBC Amendment Act, 2019 validly removed the basis of earlier objections by clarifying when the reservation regime applies to NEET-governed admissions. It further construed amended Section 16(2), including the special clause for NEET and similar national entrance tests, as a clear and unambiguous legislative choice fixing the cut-off for State quota admissions. On that reading, the amendment was valid and applicable to the admissions in question, and the reservation framework remained operative. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303395