<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (4) TMI 61 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29546</link>
    <description>The court held that the expenditure of Rs. 4 lakhs was of a revenue nature and not capital, thus depreciation was not applicable. Similarly, the expenditure of Rs. 1,09,191 for converting measurements was also considered revenue expenditure, eliminating the need for depreciation. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, awarding costs accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:31:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (4) TMI 61 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29546</link>
      <description>The court held that the expenditure of Rs. 4 lakhs was of a revenue nature and not capital, thus depreciation was not applicable. Similarly, the expenditure of Rs. 1,09,191 for converting measurements was also considered revenue expenditure, eliminating the need for depreciation. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, awarding costs accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>