https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425224 The court upheld the legality of the orders passed under Section 24(4) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, stating they were provisional measures to protect Revenue interests. It dismissed the writ appeals, emphasizing that the alleged violations of natural justice and the need for cross-examination should be addressed during the adjudication process. The court directed the respondent authorities to proceed with adjudication, allowing the appellants to present their case fully before the Adjudicating Authority. en-us Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2022 15:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425224 The court upheld the legality of the orders passed under Section 24(4) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, stating they were provisional measures to protect Revenue interests. It dismissed the writ appeals, emphasizing that the alleged violations of natural justice and the need for cross-examination should be addressed during the adjudication process. The court directed the respondent authorities to proceed with adjudication, allowing the appellants to present their case fully before the Adjudicating Authority. Case-Laws Benami Property Thu, 30 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425224