<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (2) TMI 3 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29543</link>
    <description>The court held that the technical aid fee paid by the assessee to a U.K. company was allowable as business expenditure and not liable for disallowance as capital expenditure. The court determined that the fee was for the use of knowledge and did not result in the acquisition of an enduring asset. Therefore, the entire technical aid fee was considered a revenue expenditure, allowing the assessee to claim it as a deduction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:25:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (2) TMI 3 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29543</link>
      <description>The court held that the technical aid fee paid by the assessee to a U.K. company was allowable as business expenditure and not liable for disallowance as capital expenditure. The court determined that the fee was for the use of knowledge and did not result in the acquisition of an enduring asset. Therefore, the entire technical aid fee was considered a revenue expenditure, allowing the assessee to claim it as a deduction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>