<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 777 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425222</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was considered in an alleged economic offence involving cheating, forgery and use of forged shipping and related documents to secure undue financial gain and cause loss to the State exchequer. The charge-sheet had been filed, cognizance taken, and the applicant had been summoned, but he continued to evade appearance despite repeated non-bailable warrants. The court treated the matter as a serious economic offence and held that the principle that arrest is not invariably required after filing of a charge-sheet did not assist an accused who was not cooperating with the trial process. Anticipatory bail was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:21:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 777 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425222</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was considered in an alleged economic offence involving cheating, forgery and use of forged shipping and related documents to secure undue financial gain and cause loss to the State exchequer. The charge-sheet had been filed, cognizance taken, and the applicant had been summoned, but he continued to evade appearance despite repeated non-bailable warrants. The court treated the matter as a serious economic offence and held that the principle that arrest is not invariably required after filing of a charge-sheet did not assist an accused who was not cooperating with the trial process. Anticipatory bail was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>