<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 768 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of service tax, interest, and penalty (except for the amount admitted and deposited by the appellant) and allowed the appeal with consequential relief. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the department to correctly classify services and provide substantial evidence to support its claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2023 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 768 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of service tax, interest, and penalty (except for the amount admitted and deposited by the appellant) and allowed the appeal with consequential relief. The Tribunal emphasized the need for the department to correctly classify services and provide substantial evidence to support its claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>