<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 766 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425211</link>
    <description>Even where no statutory limitation period is prescribed, fiscal authorities must adjudicate show-cause notices within a reasonable time, and inordinate unexplained delay can render belated proceedings invalid. Here, notices remained pending for nearly two decades because of revenue inaction, and the adjudicating authority also failed to consider earlier contrary departmental orders or the plea that the proceedings had become stale. The delay was found to prejudice the assessee&#039;s defence and to offend procedural fairness and natural justice, so the delayed adjudication and revived notices were held unsustainable and liable to be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:21:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 766 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425211</link>
      <description>Even where no statutory limitation period is prescribed, fiscal authorities must adjudicate show-cause notices within a reasonable time, and inordinate unexplained delay can render belated proceedings invalid. Here, notices remained pending for nearly two decades because of revenue inaction, and the adjudicating authority also failed to consider earlier contrary departmental orders or the plea that the proceedings had become stale. The delay was found to prejudice the assessee&#039;s defence and to offend procedural fairness and natural justice, so the delayed adjudication and revived notices were held unsustainable and liable to be quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>