<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 765 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425210</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the payment of defaulted duty through CENVAT credit valid, ruling Rule 8(3A) unconstitutional, and rejecting the subsequent duty demand. The case was remanded for verification of CENVAT credit transfer between the appellant&#039;s units.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 765 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425210</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the payment of defaulted duty through CENVAT credit valid, ruling Rule 8(3A) unconstitutional, and rejecting the subsequent duty demand. The case was remanded for verification of CENVAT credit transfer between the appellant&#039;s units.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>