<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 764 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425209</link>
    <description>Consideration received under a work order is not liable to sales tax unless the transaction is shown, by specific finding and supporting material, to involve transfer of property in goods or transfer of the right to use goods. Mere use of a mechanical excavator and allied machinery, or a reference to sales tax having been collected, is insufficient where control, custody, and possession of the goods were not transferred to the hirer. On the stated facts, the arrangement was treated as comparable to a prior transport and hiring contract, and the amount received under the work order was held not exigible to sales tax, with the deducted tax treated as refundable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:20:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 764 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425209</link>
      <description>Consideration received under a work order is not liable to sales tax unless the transaction is shown, by specific finding and supporting material, to involve transfer of property in goods or transfer of the right to use goods. Mere use of a mechanical excavator and allied machinery, or a reference to sales tax having been collected, is insufficient where control, custody, and possession of the goods were not transferred to the hirer. On the stated facts, the arrangement was treated as comparable to a prior transport and hiring contract, and the amount received under the work order was held not exigible to sales tax, with the deducted tax treated as refundable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>