<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 1569 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the classification of securities, software expenditure, provision for branch office expenses, treatment of non-banking assets, broken period interest, and expenditure related to the sale of shares were all in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Revenue did not press the issue regarding the provision of loss on fraud. The appeal was dismissed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2022 13:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 1569 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decisions on the classification of securities, software expenditure, provision for branch office expenses, treatment of non-banking assets, broken period interest, and expenditure related to the sale of shares were all in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The Revenue did not press the issue regarding the provision of loss on fraud. The appeal was dismissed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>