https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303377 The Court directed various companies to deposit specific amounts under protest towards tax arrears. Additionally, the companies were instructed to make monthly payments towards current liabilities. The State agreed to refund the amounts with interest if it loses the case. The interim order was modified, allowing for separate interlocutory applications. There were discrepancies in outstanding amounts for certain companies, requiring reconciliation. Intervention/impleadment applications were limited to the constitutional validity of the law, with no unconditional stay granted. The order applied only to specified parties, concluding the disposition of the interlocutory applications. en-us Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jul 2022 18:29:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303377 The Court directed various companies to deposit specific amounts under protest towards tax arrears. Additionally, the companies were instructed to make monthly payments towards current liabilities. The State agreed to refund the amounts with interest if it loses the case. The interim order was modified, allowing for separate interlocutory applications. There were discrepancies in outstanding amounts for certain companies, requiring reconciliation. Intervention/impleadment applications were limited to the constitutional validity of the law, with no unconditional stay granted. The order applied only to specified parties, concluding the disposition of the interlocutory applications. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303377