<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 759 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425204</link>
    <description>A writ petition was held not maintainable because a statutory appellate remedy was available against the impugned order. The HC dismissed the petition on the ground that the existence of an alternative remedy barred writ intervention in the circumstances stated in the text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 10:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 759 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425204</link>
      <description>A writ petition was held not maintainable because a statutory appellate remedy was available against the impugned order. The HC dismissed the petition on the ground that the existence of an alternative remedy barred writ intervention in the circumstances stated in the text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>