<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 49 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29534</link>
    <description>A premium and discount account kept as a secret reserve and omitted from the published balance-sheet can be treated as a reserve for inclusion in capital base if it is specifically appropriated by the competent authority. The governing test is that a reserve must be earmarked as such and not merely represent carried-forward surplus or undistributed profits. In the banking context, the statutory framework recognises reserves that may not appear in the published balance-sheet, and board-level allocation of profits may be sufficient. On the facts, the account reflected a deliberate hidden reserve created by valuation below market value, so the amount was includible in capital base.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 49 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29534</link>
      <description>A premium and discount account kept as a secret reserve and omitted from the published balance-sheet can be treated as a reserve for inclusion in capital base if it is specifically appropriated by the competent authority. The governing test is that a reserve must be earmarked as such and not merely represent carried-forward surplus or undistributed profits. In the banking context, the statutory framework recognises reserves that may not appear in the published balance-sheet, and board-level allocation of profits may be sufficient. On the facts, the account reflected a deliberate hidden reserve created by valuation below market value, so the amount was includible in capital base.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>