<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 732 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425177</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals for assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, overturning the additions of interest income made by the Assessing Officer. The ITAT emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence and inadmissibility of statements recorded under section 133A for making additions, setting aside the additions based solely on retracted statements. The decisions underscore the necessity of concrete evidence and procedural compliance in assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 09:15:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 732 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425177</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeals for assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, overturning the additions of interest income made by the Assessing Officer. The ITAT emphasized the lack of corroborative evidence and inadmissibility of statements recorded under section 133A for making additions, setting aside the additions based solely on retracted statements. The decisions underscore the necessity of concrete evidence and procedural compliance in assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>