https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425165 The Supreme Court clarified that its orders extending limitation periods due to the Covid-19 pandemic were not meant to extend the statutory window for provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act. As the Enforcement Directorate exceeded the 180-day limit for provisional attachment, the Court invalidated the attachment order issued after this period. The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the provisional attachment order and granting consequential benefits to the petitioners. en-us Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Jul 2022 09:14:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425165 The Supreme Court clarified that its orders extending limitation periods due to the Covid-19 pandemic were not meant to extend the statutory window for provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act. As the Enforcement Directorate exceeded the 180-day limit for provisional attachment, the Court invalidated the attachment order issued after this period. The Court allowed the writ petition, setting aside the provisional attachment order and granting consequential benefits to the petitioners. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 27 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425165