<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 716 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425161</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the demand of service tax, interest, and penalty, except for the amount admitted and deposited by the appellant. The decision was in favor of the appellant as the department failed to provide adequate evidence to substantiate their case. The appeal was allowed, granting consequential relief as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2023 11:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 716 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425161</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the demand of service tax, interest, and penalty, except for the amount admitted and deposited by the appellant. The decision was in favor of the appellant as the department failed to provide adequate evidence to substantiate their case. The appeal was allowed, granting consequential relief as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>