<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 711 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425156</link>
    <description>Enhancement of central sales tax turnover on a best judgment basis requires material showing suppressed inter-State movement of goods; absent evidence of concealed sales or prior contract-based movement outside the State, estimated enhancement cannot stand. Form F, with supporting transport and stock records already on the assessment record before the order, could not be disregarded on the ground of non-production, and a contrary finding was perverse. After the amendment to section 6A of the Central Sales Tax Act, Form F remained primary evidence of inter-State movement. The assessee&#039;s challenge was therefore accepted and the turnover enhancement and Form F rejection were unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2022 09:14:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 711 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425156</link>
      <description>Enhancement of central sales tax turnover on a best judgment basis requires material showing suppressed inter-State movement of goods; absent evidence of concealed sales or prior contract-based movement outside the State, estimated enhancement cannot stand. Form F, with supporting transport and stock records already on the assessment record before the order, could not be disregarded on the ground of non-production, and a contrary finding was perverse. After the amendment to section 6A of the Central Sales Tax Act, Form F remained primary evidence of inter-State movement. The assessee&#039;s challenge was therefore accepted and the turnover enhancement and Form F rejection were unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>