https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425154 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is justified only where the trial court's view is perverse, manifestly illegal, or based on ignored material; a plausible appreciation of evidence will not be disturbed, and the acquittal was upheld. In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the complainant must first prove that the cheques were issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability, and the presumptions under Sections 118(a) and 139 are rebuttable on a preponderance of probabilities; the complainant failed to establish privity, supporting records, or the foundational liability, so conviction could not be sustained. en-us Tue, 28 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425154 In an appeal against acquittal, interference is justified only where the trial court's view is perverse, manifestly illegal, or based on ignored material; a plausible appreciation of evidence will not be disturbed, and the acquittal was upheld. In a prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, the complainant must first prove that the cheques were issued in discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability, and the presumptions under Sections 118(a) and 139 are rebuttable on a preponderance of probabilities; the complainant failed to establish privity, supporting records, or the foundational liability, so conviction could not be sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425154