<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1608 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303358</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that neither DRI nor DGCEI officers had the authority to issue show-cause notices before 2011. The conflicting views among different High Courts on this issue led to the matter being stayed by the Supreme Court, indicating that the case was pending before the apex court for resolution. Subsequent legal developments in a similar case in the Delhi High Court granted liberty to review the challenge based on the outcome of appeals in the Supreme Court, resulting in the appellate tribunal remanding the matter for further adjudication while maintaining the status quo.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2022 17:32:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1608 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303358</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court held in favor of the assessee, ruling that neither DRI nor DGCEI officers had the authority to issue show-cause notices before 2011. The conflicting views among different High Courts on this issue led to the matter being stayed by the Supreme Court, indicating that the case was pending before the apex court for resolution. Subsequent legal developments in a similar case in the Delhi High Court granted liberty to review the challenge based on the outcome of appeals in the Supreme Court, resulting in the appellate tribunal remanding the matter for further adjudication while maintaining the status quo.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303358</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>