https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303372 On the creation of Uttarakhand, the challenge to the Labour Court award at Dehradun fell within the Uttarakhand High Court's jurisdiction, and the pending writ in Allahabad ought to have been transferred under Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000. The failure to transfer did not keep Allahabad jurisdiction alive, so withdrawal with liberty to approach the competent court was not unlawful. The fresh writ filed before the proper High Court after withdrawal could not be treated as barred by laches, because the challenge had already been pursued earlier and had remained pending in the wrong forum for years. The dismissal of the writ petition was therefore unsustainable. en-us Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 17 Jul 2022 17:32:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303372 On the creation of Uttarakhand, the challenge to the Labour Court award at Dehradun fell within the Uttarakhand High Court's jurisdiction, and the pending writ in Allahabad ought to have been transferred under Section 35 of the Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000. The failure to transfer did not keep Allahabad jurisdiction alive, so withdrawal with liberty to approach the competent court was not unlawful. The fresh writ filed before the proper High Court after withdrawal could not be treated as barred by laches, because the challenge had already been pursued earlier and had remained pending in the wrong forum for years. The dismissal of the writ petition was therefore unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303372