<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1327 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303370</link>
    <description>Agreements and MOUs must be construed together when assessing entitlement to specific performance, and the payment clause required the balance consideration only at the time of registration after disposal of the writ proceedings. A finding that the claimants were not ready and willing merely because they did not immediately tender the balance amount rested on an erroneous reading of the contract. Mere lapse of time after disposal of the writ proceedings, particularly where delay was tied to pending appellate proceedings, did not by itself defeat the suit. Allegations of possession-related conduct were also insufficient on the facts to deny equitable relief, so specific performance was held to be available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2022 17:32:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1327 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303370</link>
      <description>Agreements and MOUs must be construed together when assessing entitlement to specific performance, and the payment clause required the balance consideration only at the time of registration after disposal of the writ proceedings. A finding that the claimants were not ready and willing merely because they did not immediately tender the balance amount rested on an erroneous reading of the contract. Mere lapse of time after disposal of the writ proceedings, particularly where delay was tied to pending appellate proceedings, did not by itself defeat the suit. Allegations of possession-related conduct were also insufficient on the facts to deny equitable relief, so specific performance was held to be available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>