https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303355 A unilateral promise to convey a leasehold interest was treated as supported by valid consideration where the lease, kabuliyat and ekrarnama formed one connected transaction and the grant of the lease was an act done at the promisor's desire. The absence of reciprocal promises did not bar specific performance, because the undertaking was conditional and became enforceable in equity once the stipulated sum was tendered and the promisee remained ready and willing to perform. The appellate court was also entitled to compare the disputed signature with admitted signatures, and the late request for handwriting expert evidence was properly rejected. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Jul 2022 12:15:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303355 A unilateral promise to convey a leasehold interest was treated as supported by valid consideration where the lease, kabuliyat and ekrarnama formed one connected transaction and the grant of the lease was an act done at the promisor's desire. The absence of reciprocal promises did not bar specific performance, because the undertaking was conditional and became enforceable in equity once the stipulated sum was tendered and the promisee remained ready and willing to perform. The appellate court was also entitled to compare the disputed signature with admitted signatures, and the late request for handwriting expert evidence was properly rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 02 Dec 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303355