https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425144 Advance ruling jurisdiction is confined to the statutory questions enumerated for ruling, and there is no bar merely because a commodity may also be subject to a specific levy under another law. The authority held that questions on classification, taxability, notifications and related GST issues remain within scope, and that the buy-one-get-one circular was only an explanation of composite supply. It also held that departmental alerts, investigations or allegations do not justify rejection unless the very questions are already pending or decided in proceedings against the applicant. The advance ruling was therefore upheld and the objections failed. en-us Mon, 23 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Apr 2025 14:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425144 Advance ruling jurisdiction is confined to the statutory questions enumerated for ruling, and there is no bar merely because a commodity may also be subject to a specific levy under another law. The authority held that questions on classification, taxability, notifications and related GST issues remain within scope, and that the buy-one-get-one circular was only an explanation of composite supply. It also held that departmental alerts, investigations or allegations do not justify rejection unless the very questions are already pending or decided in proceedings against the applicant. The advance ruling was therefore upheld and the objections failed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 23 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425144