<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 688 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425133</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)-NFAC&#039;s decision and directing the deletion of the addition made under section 69A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal considered the withdrawn amount from the bank in the past two years, which could have been used for the cash deposit during demonetization, taking into account the age and circumstances of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2022 09:22:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 688 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425133</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the CIT(A)-NFAC&#039;s decision and directing the deletion of the addition made under section 69A of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal considered the withdrawn amount from the bank in the past two years, which could have been used for the cash deposit during demonetization, taking into account the age and circumstances of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425133</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>