<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 669 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425114</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted sufficient inquiries during the assessment proceedings, finding no errors in the assessment order dated 08.12.2017. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the order passed by the CIT(E) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, restoring the original assessment order. The appeal was allowed, with the decision announced on 20.05.2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 669 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425114</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the Assessing Officer (AO) had conducted sufficient inquiries during the assessment proceedings, finding no errors in the assessment order dated 08.12.2017. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the order passed by the CIT(E) under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, restoring the original assessment order. The appeal was allowed, with the decision announced on 20.05.2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>