https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303341 A writ petition challenging the amended reservation regime was held not maintainable because the Supreme Court had later directed that no further petition or application concerning admissions for the current academic year be entertained. An application seeking clarification of that direction had already been rejected on the ground that the order was clear and required no clarification. The High Court therefore declined to read the Supreme Court's direction differently, since any further scrutiny would have affected the ongoing admission process, and dismissed the petition. en-us Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:29:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303341 A writ petition challenging the amended reservation regime was held not maintainable because the Supreme Court had later directed that no further petition or application concerning admissions for the current academic year be entertained. An application seeking clarification of that direction had already been rejected on the ground that the order was clear and required no clarification. The High Court therefore declined to read the Supreme Court's direction differently, since any further scrutiny would have affected the ongoing admission process, and dismissed the petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 13 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303341