https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303340 Section 16(2) of the SEBC Act, 2018 was read as excluding admission processes already initiated before the Act commenced, and the explanation treating the entrance-test stage as the start of the process meant the later State quota seat-allocation stage could not be treated as the relevant beginning. On that construction, the revised seat matrix introducing SEBC reservation could not govern the ongoing medical admissions. The Court also held that the petitions were not barred by laches because the clear cause of action arose only when the revised provisional seat matrix disclosed the actual application of SEBC reservation, and the petitions were filed within a reasonable time. en-us Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:29:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303340 Section 16(2) of the SEBC Act, 2018 was read as excluding admission processes already initiated before the Act commenced, and the explanation treating the entrance-test stage as the start of the process meant the later State quota seat-allocation stage could not be treated as the relevant beginning. On that construction, the revised seat matrix introducing SEBC reservation could not govern the ongoing medical admissions. The Court also held that the petitions were not barred by laches because the clear cause of action arose only when the revised provisional seat matrix disclosed the actual application of SEBC reservation, and the petitions were filed within a reasonable time. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 02 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303340