https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303350 Limited judicial review applies in disciplinary matters, and the disciplinary authority retains primary control over the choice of penalty. Writ interference is justified only where the punishment is vitiated by procedural irregularity or is shockingly disproportionate. Producing a forged educational certificate at the time of appointment constitutes grave misconduct because it strikes at the trust and confidence essential to the employment relationship. On that basis, factors such as the absence of a material qualification requirement, an alleged assurance of leniency, a criminal acquittal on benefit of doubt, and denial of back wages did not justify disturbing the dismissal. en-us Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:29:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303350 Limited judicial review applies in disciplinary matters, and the disciplinary authority retains primary control over the choice of penalty. Writ interference is justified only where the punishment is vitiated by procedural irregularity or is shockingly disproportionate. Producing a forged educational certificate at the time of appointment constitutes grave misconduct because it strikes at the trust and confidence essential to the employment relationship. On that basis, factors such as the absence of a material qualification requirement, an alleged assurance of leniency, a criminal acquittal on benefit of doubt, and denial of back wages did not justify disturbing the dismissal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=303350