<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>E-way Bill</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118054</link>
    <description>Transporting goods without an e-way bill, even where an e-invoice accompanies the consignment, attracts a statutory transit non-compliance penalty; the vehicle was intercepted and a penalty of 200% was imposed under section 129, and the advisory reply stated that the 200% penalty as imposed is correct.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:24:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:54:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>E-way Bill</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118054</link>
      <description>Transporting goods without an e-way bill, even where an e-invoice accompanies the consignment, attracts a statutory transit non-compliance penalty; the vehicle was intercepted and a penalty of 200% was imposed under section 129, and the advisory reply stated that the 200% penalty as imposed is correct.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:24:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=118054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>