<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (2) TMI 60 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29513</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitions by the Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Delhi, regarding the inclusion of outstanding fees of a chartered accountant in total wealth for wealth-tax assessment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, upheld by the court, found no evidence to treat the fees as enforceable claims under sections 7(1) and 7(2) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The court emphasized the exclusivity of these sections for asset valuation, disregarding conflicting High Court decisions based on outdated provisions. As the case did not raise a legal question, no reference was deemed necessary, and the petitions were dismissed without costs due to the respondent&#039;s non-appearance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:39:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=68510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (2) TMI 60 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29513</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitions by the Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Delhi, regarding the inclusion of outstanding fees of a chartered accountant in total wealth for wealth-tax assessment. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, upheld by the court, found no evidence to treat the fees as enforceable claims under sections 7(1) and 7(2) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. The court emphasized the exclusivity of these sections for asset valuation, disregarding conflicting High Court decisions based on outdated provisions. As the case did not raise a legal question, no reference was deemed necessary, and the petitions were dismissed without costs due to the respondent&#039;s non-appearance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=29513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>