https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425062 Additional documents could not be introduced for the first time at the appellate stage in support of a section 9 insolvency application because they had not been placed before the Adjudicating Authority and no leave had been sought below. A pre-existing dispute also barred admission of the petition: the work order required compliance with labour, PF, ESI and other statutory obligations, and contemporaneous correspondence showed ongoing disagreement over those compliance documents before the demand notice. Applying the settled test for a real and plausible dispute, the rejection of the section 9 application was upheld. en-us Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425062 Additional documents could not be introduced for the first time at the appellate stage in support of a section 9 insolvency application because they had not been placed before the Adjudicating Authority and no leave had been sought below. A pre-existing dispute also barred admission of the petition: the work order required compliance with labour, PF, ESI and other statutory obligations, and contemporaneous correspondence showed ongoing disagreement over those compliance documents before the demand notice. Applying the settled test for a real and plausible dispute, the rejection of the section 9 application was upheld. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 14 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425062