<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 615 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425060</link>
    <description>A Section 7 insolvency proceeding withdrawn before constitution of the committee of creditors may be supported by settlement terms recorded in the withdrawal order where those terms form the basis of withdrawal. The tribunal noted that, in exercise of inherent powers, the adjudicating or appellate forum can incorporate the settlement into the order when omission to do so would prejudice the parties&#039; agreed arrangement. Because the settlement expressly preserved the creditor&#039;s right to revive or re-initiate proceedings on default and to pursue other remedies for breach, modification of the withdrawal order was warranted. The settlement terms were therefore directed to form part of the order, with liberty preserved for revival, restoration, contempt, and other permissible proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:13:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 615 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425060</link>
      <description>A Section 7 insolvency proceeding withdrawn before constitution of the committee of creditors may be supported by settlement terms recorded in the withdrawal order where those terms form the basis of withdrawal. The tribunal noted that, in exercise of inherent powers, the adjudicating or appellate forum can incorporate the settlement into the order when omission to do so would prejudice the parties&#039; agreed arrangement. Because the settlement expressly preserved the creditor&#039;s right to revive or re-initiate proceedings on default and to pursue other remedies for breach, modification of the withdrawal order was warranted. The settlement terms were therefore directed to form part of the order, with liberty preserved for revival, restoration, contempt, and other permissible proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425060</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>