<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (7) TMI 609 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425054</link>
    <description>Refund of service tax paid on ocean freight was examined as a cash refund claim under Section 142(3) read with Section 11B, but the Tribunal did not decide the merits. It noted that an identical refund issue had already been remanded in another matter and that the larger bench reference on cash refund under Section 142(3) was still pending. On that basis, it followed the earlier course and remanded the matter to the original authority for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 20:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (7) TMI 609 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425054</link>
      <description>Refund of service tax paid on ocean freight was examined as a cash refund claim under Section 142(3) read with Section 11B, but the Tribunal did not decide the merits. It noted that an identical refund issue had already been remanded in another matter and that the larger bench reference on cash refund under Section 142(3) was still pending. On that basis, it followed the earlier course and remanded the matter to the original authority for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=425054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>