<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Error: Deleted Penalty on Dealer u/s 42(5) OVAT Act; Upholds STO and JCST Orders on VAT Penalty.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64626</link>
    <description>Deletion of penalty - Tribunal erred in deleting the penalty imposable on the dealer under Section 42(5) of the OVAT Act, particularly since it came to the conclusion that the levy of tax on the uncollected VAT amount by the dealer was not excusable and upholding the orders of the STO and the JCST in that regard. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:12:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:12:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=685069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Error: Deleted Penalty on Dealer u/s 42(5) OVAT Act; Upholds STO and JCST Orders on VAT Penalty.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64626</link>
      <description>Deletion of penalty - Tribunal erred in deleting the penalty imposable on the dealer under Section 42(5) of the OVAT Act, particularly since it came to the conclusion that the levy of tax on the uncollected VAT amount by the dealer was not excusable and upholding the orders of the STO and the JCST in that regard. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 09:12:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=64626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>